Contents
- (1) Principals, Aims, (2) Strategies, Manner, (3) Performance, Doing.
- Sequences
- Click for better view of top
- Incongruities
- Layers
- Look for figurative, oddness or "rule-breaking".
- Gaps
- Those gaps that, when filled in, make the situation particularly important, interesting, vivid, juicy, frightening, hopeful, etc.
- Develop repertoire
- Bodily Movement
- Choose from:
- E.g., pushing-pulling, self-propelled motion, following path.
- Causal
- E.g., Agent moves entity to another location, turn entity into something else.
- Click for better view of top.
- Common Activities
- E.g., Mapping, Hunting, Making a Journey
- Cultural
- E.g., British House, German Symphony.
- Developing a repertoire of useful Source Domains -- (1) learn groupings, (2) become familiar with the entailments of various metaphors:
- Choose a metaphor for its potential to alter disputants' Target Domain constructively. Intervene to shift towards areas of agreement
- Pluses & Minuses
- Look For:
- Elements
- Agents, Affected Parties, Forces/Movement, Possessions, Obstacles, Locations
- Standpoint
- Familiar pattern of relationships among elements.
- Click for better view on right
- Choice of Mode in Using Metaphor
- Metaphor Intervention Mode
- Click for better view on left
- A negotiator's or mediator's goal is to understand and influence disputants' thinking to facilitate resolution of conflict. Metaphoric mapping is key to understanding and influencing this thinking.
- Presenter: Thomas H. Smith, Ph.D.
- Kerkrade, The Netherlands, 20-24 April 2002
- Choice of Mode in Employing Metaphors During Dispute Resolution
- Supported by the European Commission, Research Director General, Human Potential Programme, High-Level Scientific Conferences
- Sponsored by the European Science Foundation
- Euroconference on Consciousness and the Imagination
- Metaphor Detection Mode
- Pluses & Minuses
- Discover how dispute is metaphorically understood by disputants in terms of Source Domain(s). Query for clarifications, tuning into operating metaphor(s), then expand.
- Finding the metaphors that clients are already using by (1) attending to the items below, and (2) querying for clarifications.
- Metaphor from whose point of view, about what.
|
(1) Principals, Aims, (2) Strategies, Manner, (3) Performance, Doing.
|
Sequences
Do you find a familiar sequence present? Is there a series of events?
Do you find a familiar pattern of relationships among elements?
Do you find Time accounted for in a distinctive way?
|
Click for better view of top
|
Incongruities
|
Layers
|
Look for figurative, oddness or "rule-breaking".
|
Gaps
|
Those gaps that, when filled in, make the situation particularly important, interesting, vivid, juicy, frightening, hopeful, etc.
|
Develop repertoire
|
Bodily Movement
|
Choose from:
|
E.g., pushing-pulling, self-propelled motion, following path.
|
Causal
|
E.g., Agent moves entity to another location, turn entity into something else.
|
Click for better view of top.
|
Common Activities
|
E.g., Mapping, Hunting, Making a Journey
|
Cultural
|
E.g., British House, German Symphony.
|
Developing a repertoire of useful Source Domains -- (1) learn groupings, (2) become familiar with the entailments of various metaphors:
|
Choose a metaphor for its potential to alter disputants' Target Domain constructively. Intervene to shift towards areas of agreement
|
Pluses & Minuses
+ Easier to learn.
+ Rapidity of results.
+ Directive in moving towards resolution.
-+ More solution-centered.
- Risk misunderstanding.
|
Look For:
|
Elements
|
Agents, Affected Parties, Forces/Movement, Possessions, Obstacles, Locations
|
Standpoint
|
Familiar pattern of relationships among elements.
|
Click for better view on right
|
Choice of Mode in Using Metaphor
|
Metaphor Intervention Mode
|
Click for better view on left
|
A negotiator's or mediator's goal is to understand and influence disputants' thinking to facilitate resolution of conflict. Metaphoric mapping is key to understanding and influencing this thinking.
|
Presenter: Thomas H. Smith, Ph.D.
|
Kerkrade, The Netherlands, 20-24 April 2002
|
Choice of Mode in Employing Metaphors During Dispute Resolution
|
Supported by the European Commission, Research Director General, Human Potential Programme, High-Level Scientific Conferences
|
Sponsored by the European Science Foundation
|
Euroconference on Consciousness and the Imagination
|
Metaphor Detection Mode
|
Pluses & Minuses
+ More client-centered.
+ Moves with clients' changing conceptions.
+ Enhances communications.
+ Reduced risk of misunderstanding.
-+Dialog required.
- Depends upon solutions emerging spontaneously.
|
Discover how dispute is metaphorically understood by disputants in terms of Source Domain(s). Query for clarifications, tuning into operating metaphor(s), then expand.
|
Finding the metaphors that clients are already using by (1) attending to the items below, and (2) querying for clarifications.
|
Metaphor from whose point of view, about what.
|
Axon File: c:\axon2002\metares\euroconference.xon
Last modified: 2002-04-14 13:05:20
|